Tuesday 10 September 2013

A. W. Tozer - The Pursuit of God - Preface






























In this hour of all but universal darkness one cheering gleam appears: Within the fold of conservative Christianity there are to be found increasing numbers of persons whose religious lives are marked by a growing hunger after God Himself. They are eager for spiritual realities and will not be put off with words, nor will they be content with correct “interpretations” of truth. They are athirst for God, and they will not be satisfied till they have drunk deep at the Fountain of Living Water.

This is the only real harbinger of revival which I have been able to detect anywhere on the religious horizon. It may be the cloud the size of a man’s hand for which few saints here and there have been looking. It can result in a resurrection of life for many souls and a recapture of that radiant wonder which should accompany faith in Christ, that wonder which has all but fled the Church of God in our day.

But this hunger must be recognised by our religious leaders. Current evangelism has (to change the figure) laid the altar and divided the sacrifice into parts, but now seems satisfied to count the stones and rearrange the pieces with never a care that there is not a sign of fire upon the top of lofty Carmel. But God be thanked that there are a few who care. They are those who, while they love the altar and delight in the sacrifice, are yet unable to reconcile themselves the “piercing sweetness” of the love of Christ about whom all the holy prophets did write and the psalmists did sing.

There is today no lack of Bible teachers to set forth correctly the principles and the doctrines of Christ, but too many of them seem satisfied to teach the fundamentals of the faith year after year, strangely unaware that there is in their ministry no manifest Presence, nor anything unusual in their personal lives. They minister constantly to believers who feel within their breasts a longing which their teaching simply does not satisfy.

I trust I speak in charity, but the lack in our pulpits is real. Milton’s terrible sentence applies to our day as accurately as it did to his: “The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed.” It is a solemn thing, and no small scandal in the Kingdom, to see God’s children starving while actually seated at the Father’s table. The truth of Wesley’s words is established before our eyes: “Orthodoxy, or right opinion, is, at best, a very slender part of religion. Though right tempers cannot subsist without right opinions, yet right opinions may subsist without right tempers. There may be a right opinion of God without either love or one right temper toward Him. Satan is a proof of this.”

Thanks to our splendid Bible societies and to other effective agencies for dissemination of the Word, there are today many millions of people who hold “right opinions” probably more than ever before in the history of the Church. Yet I wonder if there was ever a time when true spiritual worship was at a lower ebb. To great sections of the Church the art of worship has been lost entirely, and in its place has come that strange and foreign thing called the “program”. This word has been borrowed from the stage and applied with sad wisdom to the type of public service which now passes for worship among us.

Sound Bible exposition is an imperative must in the Church of the Living God. Without it no church can be a New Testament church in any strict meaning of the term. But exposition may be carried on in such a way as to leave the hearers devoid of any true spiritual nourishment whatsever. For it is not mere words that nourish the soul, but God Himself, and unless and until the hearers find God in personal experience they are not the better for having heard the truth. The Bible is not an end in itself, but a means to bring men to an intimate and satisfying knowledge of God, that they may enter into Him, that they may delight in his presence, may taste and know the inner sweetness of the very God Himself in the core and centre of their hearts.

This book is a modest attempt to aid God’s hungry children so to find Him. Nothing here is new except in the sense that it is a discovery which my own heart has made of spiritual realities most delightful and wonderful to me. Others before me have gone much farther into these holy mysteries than I have done, but if my fire is not large it is yet real, and there may be those who can light their candle at its flame.

-          A.W. Tozer, Chicago, Illinois, June 16, 1948

23 comments:

  1. I thought I knew God and hungered to be closer to him so joined a church where I was told my experience of him was my subconscious. This hurt at first as I felt I was either being lied to by the church or lied to by God. I left the church and no longer believe there is a God.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Turned out the church was right and I was lying to myself. What I had been convinced all my life was God in my life was me. I now know there is no God. At first I hated the church as I felt they had taken God away from me. Now I thank them for revealing the truth and showing me none of it was real. Truth hurts sometimes but I would rather the hurt and move on than be stuck living a lie.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have you considered that what your church told you about God being 'subconscious' was perhap unsound to begin with, and not a true representation of God's nature and Christianity? I think God can certainly move through our subconscious, but he would not be God if he only existed in such. It's certainly not a biblical idea. That would appear to bring you back to square one, leaving you free to search for God again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would have thought qualified members of staff and people of authority within the church who have grown up in church communities would know a lot more than me as I had very limited experience and knowledge and no theological training at all. All I had was childhood prayers and what I thought was a handful of experiences of a God I thought I knew and used to talk to. I didn't even have a bible when I was growing up. Anyone n church probably had more experience and knew more than me. It turned out everything I thought I knew and experienced was wrong and was probably wishful thinking, my subconscious and me convincing myself things were real. It's ok, I don't mind. I'm glad to have cleared it up ant to be knowing the truth now. It's all in the past and behind me now and I'm quite pleased as some of it was difficult to handle and not always seay to live with. Things like having flashes and just knowing things about people, dreams coming true, feeling what other people feel emotionally and knowing why they feel feel it, that sort of thing. I thought God gave me messages to pass on to people, that sort of thing. I never knew why I knew so much or what I was supposed to do with it. That's why I started going to church. I thought it was all coming from God and that he was telling me to go to church and find out how to use what I had. No one there took me serious or understood me. They wanted me to do things their way which didn't work for me. If I was right and there was a God guiding me to the church as I thought he was, then there would have been someone there open to how I thought God was using me as I was sure he was calling me there for a reason. Turned out I was wrong as it all went pear shaped and I was told it was my subconscious not God talking to me.
    I'm quite happy about it as some of the things I saw in people were upsetting and it was always people's painful problems and emotions I felt and had to pray for and deal with. Never anything good or happy. It was difficult to cope with at times, specially as I couldn't talk to anyone about it and how it affected me as people just thought I was crazy so I kept it to myself.
    I'm happy to ignore it all. It doesn't happen so often now I know its my subconscious and take no notice. If there was a God and he gave it to me as a gift, its practically gone now because I don't want it. I'm pretty sure the church was right and it was my subconscious. They are the experts not me. They should know. What I thought was God isn't and that's the only way I could have believed in him, as something real I felt living inside me telling me what I needed to know and making me feel what I needed to feel. That's what he was to me. Turned out I was wrong. Life is much easier without him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. People in the church were equally as convinced God was talking to them telling them I was wrong. We couldn't both be right so I came to the conclusion we were both wrong and it was both our subconscious talking to us and not God. I don't think there ever was a God now I come to think of it. I believe it was only ever mans subconscious thinking there was a God. Why would I want to search for something I no longer believe exists. If there was a God it would have been the God I knew that spoke to me as a child. I now know he was as real as Father Christmas. Once you know magic isn't real, you can never go back to believing. God is the same. The magic has gone and it took God with it. I can't believe anymore even if I wanted to. It's gone !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Even church leaders get it wrong sometimes.

    It's interesting how you say is easier without God. If I couldn't be Christian, I'd probably follow the Native American Religion or Taoism. Atheist is the last thing I'd be however. It simply betrays too much of human experience and logic. I'd have to believe life has no meaning, human life has no value (or any life for that matter) and I wouldn't be able to say anything is moral (I could never do anything good or evil, as there'd be no right or wrong). That's a worldview I simply couldn't adhere to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What on earth makes you think the lack of belief in God makes me think life has no meaning, value and that I have no right or wrong ?

    Just because I don't believe in God doesn't mean I don't value the world and those in it, treating them with respect and compassion. A disbelief in Gods doesn't mean I lack values. It just means I do something because I believe it to be the right thing to do, not because some God told me. I value this life, not death. I value the here and now and people that are here now because that's what I believe in.
    Do you honestly think because I don't believe in God I don't believe in the world I live in and want to do right by it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. To clarify, I find life easier without God because I had no idea what I was supposed to do with what I thought God had given me to use. I got to much conflicting advice from the people in the church community and ended up very confused by it all. Life is much simpler without it all. I stick to my own beliefs and to people who are helpful, supportive and encouraging. My beliefs have now changed as I realise the divine guidance, inspiration, words, pictures and wisdom were all simply inspired by myself and my own imagination. They were not the gifts from God I thought them to be. No one will ever convince me otherwise and I won't ever share them with anyone again because doing so only caused me grief. I was judged, condemned and treated like a mad man for doing so by people in the church. I'm never going through that again. It's all in the past and staying there. Even if there was a God, I want nothing more to do with his people and spending eternity with them would be hell.
    I'm staying with those who are good to be with who want and accept me for who I am.

    ReplyDelete
  9. People in the church looked down their nose at me and treated me like an outcast. They made me feel like the lowest of the low. I ended up miserable, insecure and constantly trying to explain and prove myself. Life's to short to live like that so these days I choose not to.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Going back to my second post. You're jumping the gun a bit - notice I didn't say you believe those things, I said the atheistic worldview has no logical place for them. Those are the logical conclusions that a disbelief in God must come to. Atheism by definition believes this (Nietsche, Satre and the recent John Grey, all atheists, have all said life is utterly meaningless with God). These aren't really arguments either, they're essentially in the atheist guidebook. When someone takes God out of the picture, it doesn't necessarily make things simpler, it opens the door to a lot of complications (philosophical, scientific and humanistic). It's not as simple as 'not believing in God'. The whole package needs to be adopted otherwise it isn't really atheism, nor an honest disbelief in God.

    Much of the issue sounds like the church you went to. How is it possible then that I've found my church to be a place of honesty, transparency, open-mindedness, genuine care and interest (for the small and big parts of life), undeserved love and acceptance?

    Can God and Christians really be so awful, as you say, even when my experience has been the near-opposite to yours?

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is no atheist guide book, no set of beliefs or way of thinking that atheist follow, no package to adopt. The only belief requirement to being an atheist is the belief that Gods don't exist. Sure some atheists promote their thoughts and beliefs but that doesn't mean all atheists have to share their philosophy. Atheism is simply the lack of belief in the existence of Gods, after that we can believe whatever we want. I don't follow anyone's philosophy other than my own.

    The fact that you and I have such different experience from the church only helps to solidify my belief that its people that make the world go round, people who build us up or knock us down and there is no God influencing them. The kindest, most caring, helpful, loving and compassionate people in my life have been none Christian. Of course the people I met in the church are probably very good to their family and friends, but most people are. I saw no evidence in them of the God they claimed was transforming them to be better people so I didn't believe it to be authentic. They could preach it but sadly couldn't live it so in my book it doesn't count. I could preach many things about myself saying Im intelligent, athletic, good looking with a great sense of humour, but just because I say it doesn't make it so. I found the churches preaching about their God to be the same. All they did was convince me none of it, including their God was real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are things that logically follow from disbelief in God.

      Let's take an example from morality. If God doesn't exist, you are simply a collection of matter - nothing more. You would have no significance to the universe, because you would only be atoms. As there would be no transient being to define what is right and wrong, there'd be no good nor evil, only actions that you take. How could there be good and evil?

      From this even the holocaust was not morally wrong, but not good either. It just was. Sure you could say it wasn't beneficial to the species and therefore shouldn't have been committed - but that doesn't mean it wasn't morally wrong, only that it wasn't productive towards natural selection. There's no basis to claim ethics. But the fact that we do have morals and do get outraged by atrocities is an evidence for God. That's why atheism is somewhat ridiculous, as can be observed in this video between a theist and atheist philosopher:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU_K_a7fW1A

      Delete
    2. Lol, don't believe everything you hear on the Internet. I don't know who Rosenburg is but this guy obviously doesn't like him and feels a need to pick wholes in his theories and publicly ridicule him. Not a good look in my opinion.
      Of course I'm hear and I think and I plan and do, I have feelings, thoughts, morals and emotions. I don't know how but that doesn't mean God has to be the answer. It means my brain works.
      How does a sperm and an egg create a sack of cells that eventually becomes a living, thinking, breathing person? What came first, the chicken or the egg ? I don't have the answers but that doesn't mean the only answer can be God.
      Just because a guy on YouTube says something doesn't make it so. In biblical days, anything no one had the answer to was credited to God. Many of those things have since been explained by science. It seems that some of humanity still credits that which it doesn't understand to God. I think there is another answer, it just hasn't all been discovered and understood yet.
      Sorry but I don't believe the answer to be a magician in the sky.

      Delete
    3. It's a proven fact that chemical reactions in our brains affect our mood, what we eat affects how we feel, exercise makes us feel better, interaction with others affects us and what we learn affects our decisions. Yes we are complex and a person who's brain is wired differently, thinks, feels reacts and works differently to others.. If you look a how cave man looked, lived and probably thought, its easy to see how mankind is constantly learning and evolving.

      Delete
    4. I do believe we have an energy inside us that is our spirit, something we can tune into but that we don't understand and I believe this has what we call a kind of supernatural ability. But I only think we believe it to be supernatural because we haven't discovered what it is or how it works yet. I believe it's something natural a bit like magnetism having the ability to attract or repel. I think there are lots of things in this world we don't yet understand.
      What I don't believe is there are Gods that plan, think, purposefully design and create with a plan for the future ruling over us. I don't believe in angels, demons, heaven or hell. I don't believe in Zeus, Apollo, the God of the bible or any other Gods.
      I don't care wether or not there is a label for what I believe and as my beliefs changed a few years ago, I'm open to the possibility of knowledge and experience changing my thoughts again. Indeed, I would be a fool to think I have all the answers and close my mind to what the world brings. I find it interesting finding out what people think, believe and why.

      Delete
  12. Dr William Lane Craig is one of the most esteemed professors of philosophy and theology. He's authored/edited more than two dozen books and is a veteran debater - having debated atheists like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens over the existence of God (and having won those debates I believe). So when you said, "Lol, don't believe everything you hear on the internet," I can only assume you weren't aware of his credentials.

    The video you watched was a debate between him and Professor Rosenberg - the question being, 'is faith in God reasonable?' Naturally he's supposed to show the opposition's points don't make sense. Nothing inherently personal about it. He actually debates Rosenberg with much grace. Watch the whole debate and you'll discover that.

    Notice how Dr Craig starts with, 'according to Dr Rosenburg...words have no meaning, there are no morals, you cannot think about anything' etc. These aren't exactly contested much within atheism, most of them are accepted by honest academic atheists. Dr Craig is rather showing that the implications of atheism, what Rosenburg adheres to, what it demands by definition, is absurd - and therefore evidence for God.

    You seem to come from the Dawkins school of thought that says science and God are separate explanations. The founding fathers of science, Galileo, Newton and their buddies were all theists and set out to do science knowing it would compliment, not contradict God. Science is simply humanity's observation of the universe. Why would they be separate explanations. You're running into the common issue of improperly defining God. God is an agent, while science which functions automatically is the mechanism, but that doesn't get rid of an agent. My watch is blind and automatic (like gravity) yet I still know it had a designer. You can't explain away God by showing there's science. If anything science compliments God with its numerous complexities, creativity and origin that only a rational, transient being could create. There's simply no way around it.

    I'm going to be busy over the next few days and so won't have the time to debate at length, but I'll certainly read your reply.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Don't think you read my last comment about what I actually "do" believe. I don't subscribe to any school of thought and I don't remember saying anything about Christians not being into science. As I said, I do think there is a source of energy that we don't understand and can't explain but I don't believe it to be any sort of thinking, purposefully creating, planning God like Zeus, Apollo or the God of the Bible.

    I googled your guy and he says that without a deity we and the planet will eventually die. Yes, I believe this to be true and I'm happy for it to be so. He also said the purpose of life is to Glorify God. Think I'll pass on the narcissistic deity theory. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  14. When it comes to the bible I have my own theory. For example, I believe Jesus was a philosopher who believed in God. Being illegitimate in those days was probably a big stigma, read any lineage in the bible and it gives a list of fathers not mothers. Having a father was important. We know that Mary was pregnant before marrying Joseph and not with his child. We read the phrase that people were blessed with children, this tells us the they were considered a blessing from God. Jesus believes in God the creator, God the holy father who created him. An illegitimate person may use this to say God is their father. People today sometimes use the expression "brothers and sisters in Christ" did Jesus coin the phrase.
    Take the story of the woman who had been bleeding who touched Jesus robe and Jesus said, your faith has healed you. Just what did he mean by that ? Her bleeding made her an untouchable, continual bleeding would have made her life harsh and she would have become an outcast. When she touched Jesus how would anyone have known wether or not she had stopped bleeding ? The bible doesn't say her bleeding stopped, did it stop. What was the healing. Was it physical or mental. Should the translation have been her belief had healed her. A belief that she was no longer untouchable, a belief that the law that said her bleeding made her untouchable was now abolished. Jesus didn't complain that her touch would have made him or anyone else she may have touched in the crowd unclean, there was no mention of it. That's because he didn't believe that her touch would have done so. He didn't believe in this law. Jesus was known as a rule breaker that changed people's thinking. Jesus never said her bleeding had stopped. I think she was an example of overcoming a man made rule rather than a miraculous healing. I believe it was a healing of the mind not the body.
    These are just a few examples of my interpretation of the bible.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I can see why you were not popular with your church. Bet you gave them plenty of food for thought.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous, I think your theory about the bleeding woman makes sense. It's the best explanation I've heard. I would be interested in hearing more of your biblical theories. You shouldn't let the church put you off sharing what you have to say.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks but I rarely talk about this stuff these days, I used to write a lot down but I deleted and burnt it all, I even burnt my bible. It was a symbolic cremation of something that's dead and gone to me. I did mourn the loss of my faith as it was a huge and important part of my life, the biggest part of who I was, it hurt and I felt lost without it. I needed to be able to put it behind me and move on so burning everything made sure it was dead to me and I couldn't. It's not a grave I visit very often as there are no happy memories in it for me. I live for today not a miserable past.

    ReplyDelete